Applying Factor Analysis to Population Surveys in Afghanistan to Facilitate Improved Decision Making
Abstract
As the U.S. Military’s involvement in Afghanistan has changed from a traditional kinetic fight to counter-insurgency to nation building, so too has our need to understand the population which we seek to assist. Multiple agencies have taken on the task of surveying Afghans at the national, provincial and district levels. Conducting these surveys carries great risk due to the presence of Taliban fighters and terrorist safe havens strewn throughout the country. While conducting the surveys has its share of obstacles, properly interpreting the results carry its own unique set of challenges. We use three surveys that have been mainstays as sources of information for the U.S. Military and other nations to understand popular perceptions. Using Factor Analysis on these three surveys collected over the last 3-5 years allows us to analyze all questions and responses in the surveys by identifying the most relevant data analytically vice a subjective analyst or commander deciding what is most important. We do so by using a methodology that establishes quality, analytically derived indicators (groups of survey questions) by using these three survey instruments collected throughout Afghanistan. We generate indicators from survey data using Factor Analysis then assess them by using nonparametric statistics techniques to detect spatial and temporal changes throughout the country. The final result is a full analytics suite that provides perspective to an analyst regarding indicator change across the country over time. Further, we improve the commander’s ability to allocate scarce resources to particular districts and provinces which need the most attention.
Keywords: Factor Analysis, Survey, Non-Parametric Statistics, Mann-Whitney, Military, Afghanistan, Spatial and Temporal change, Spreadsheet, Hypothesis Testing, Analytics
DOI: 10.54941/ahfe100199
Cite this paper
More from this volume
- Soldier Narrative Analysis as Part of a Rapid Fielding Program
- Basic Study on Prevention of Human Error-Anchoring Bias in Relationship between Objective and Subjective Probability-
- Assessing Fluid Rationality and Its Relations to Cognitive Styles
- Analytical Capability to Better Understand and Anticipate Extremist Shifts Within Populations in Failing States
- Are Deliberative People More Consistent in Decision Making?
- Measuring the Effects of Cultures on Website Use
- Meaning Making Regarding Threat Narrative Based on Discourse Analysis
- Semantic Enrichment and Reasoning for Mobile Data Collection of Socio-Cultural Data
- Basic Study on Prevention of Human Error- How Cognitive Biases Distort Decision Making and Lead to Crucial Accidents -
- The End of a Civilization: What Moderns Might Learn from Thucydides’ Peloponnesian War
- The Roots of Self-Doubt (and Self-Loathing) in the West
- Extracting Understanding from Automated Metaphor Identification: Contrasting Concepts of Poverty Across Cultures and Languages


AHFE Open Access