Workload Responses to Sensory-Motor Tasks Under Time Pressure in Life Sciences Labs: Effects of Task Complexity
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess workload response during a simulated pipetting task of different complexity under time pressure conditions. Thirty healthy volunteers (12 female / 18 male) gave their written informed consent to take part. After training they underwent a standardized test protocol including a baseline measurement (REST), a control pipetting condition under time pressure (CON), a complex pipetting task under time pressure (COMP), and recovery (RECOV). To avoid order effects pipetting tasks have been carried out in a counterbalanced order. Measurements included heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), breathing rate (BR), as well as diastolic and systolic blood pressure (DBP, SBP). NASA TLX was applied in order to assess perceived workload. There were minor, but significant elevations of HR, BR, SBP during CON and COMP when compared to REST and RECOV. However, with the exception of HRV measures, physiological data were not sensitive to variations in cognitive demands between the two pipetting conditions. Further, perceived mental effort differed significantly between CON and COMP and thus mirrored the different complexity of tasks. It can be concluded that the addition of cognitive demands under sensory-motor demands can be reflected by some HRV indices and subjective workload ratings but not by HR, BR and BP.
Keywords: Life science automation, physiological workload response, heart rate, blood pressure, pipetting, time pressure, task complexity, NASA Task Load Index
DOI: 10.54941/ahfe1001292
Cite this paper
More from this volume
- Development of an Evidence Based Toolkit to Support Safe Design for Children
- Inclusive Service Design: In Search of Better Services
- Mass and Density of Materials: Quantity Surveying Students’ Knowledge and Perceptions
- Time Study and Design
- “Prepare For Work” Intervention Model in a Group of Operators MSD High Prevalence of Shoulder and Cervical Spine
- Development of a Tool Kit for Integrated System Validation
- Remote Collaboration-Study on Factors Affecting Team Mental Models
- Modeling a Tangible User Interface for Navigation in an Information Space
- Human Factors of ISO 9241-110 in the Intercultural Context
- A Campus-based Information Sharing and Communicating System for Collaborative Design and Decision Making
- A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Safety Beliefs about Products and Warnings: Brazil vs. United States
- Visualizing Prioritized Typical and Potential Risks of Consumer Products by Graph Mining of an Accident Database


AHFE Open Access