Comparing Mystery Shopping with Smartphone and Traditional Mystery Shopping
Abstract
This study aims to investigate different methodologies in performing mystery shopping programs, i.e. new (call, SMS, and notes) and traditional methodologies in the aspect of shoppers’ workload, satisfaction, consistency, accuracy and timing. For that purpose, a single factor experiment with four levels was designed in this research. A smartphone and computer-mediated experiment was conducted with 40 Chinese students. The results showed that the traditional method was the most consistent method and there was no significant difference among the other three mystery shopping methods. However, the results also demonstrated that traditional method was the least accurate and there was no significant difference among the other three methods. The researcher also found that when conducting a mystery shopping program, the SMS method took the longest time, followed by the calling method. Finally, this research discusses the implications of these findings for developing mystery shopping guidelines.
Keywords: Mystery Shopping, Convenience Store, Smartphone, Workload, Satisfaction, Consistency, Accuracy, Timing
DOI: 10.54941/ahfe100560
Cite this paper
More from this volume
- Transforming Physiological Data from a Generic Sensor to a Specialised One for Affect Detection
- Imitated Mind Uploading by Using Electroencephalography
- Someone to Talk To
- Exploring the Innovation Application of Web Camera Based on Business Models - Taking Parent-Baby Communication as an Example
- Effect of Age on Superimposition of Head-Up Display
- Evaluation of Kawaii Size by Measuring ECG
- Physiological Responses Caused by Kawaii Feeling in Watching Photos
- The Role of the Designer in the Affective Design Process: the Principle of Accordance
- Measurement Magic to Deliver Hair Beauty
- Emotion and Interface Design
- Description of Subjective Impression for the Service Experience
- The Elderly’s Text Entry on Smart Phones and Tablets: Challenges and Implications


AHFE Open Access