Human reliability analysis in aviation accidents: A review
Abstract
In the civil aviation sector, human factors is the primary cause of many safety incidents. Aircraft flying, maintenance, and operations are the major tasks that are heavily dependent on professionals; thus, they are subject to human error probability. Human reliability analysis (HRA), which can evaluate human state and managing risk, has been developed over the years to identify, predict, and reduce human failures throughout aircraft operating procedures. Different generations of HRA tools have been developed to quantify the risks that are associated with safety accidents, including such as the Human Error Assessment and Reduction Technique, Technique for Human Error Prediction, Standardized Plant Analysis Risk Human Reliability Analysis, Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Methods, and Bayesian Network (BN). However, little is known about how these approaches are applied in aviation safety. This review aimed to systematically examine the current status of research on HRA in aviation accidents. A total of 13 studies were included and encompassed the studies of the first, second, and third generalizations of HRA alone or in combination with other methods (e.g., Improved Analytics Hierarchy Process, Functional Resonance Analysis Methods, Human Factor Analysis and Classification System, and Fault Tree Analysis). Results revealed that the third-generation HRA with BN was frequently used, showing great application potential for flight safety risk prevention and reduction. In the future, testing other third-generation HRA models driven by data in the field of airworthiness is necessary.
Keywords: Aviation, Safety, Human Reliability Analysis, Performance Shaping Factors, Human Error
DOI: 10.54941/ahfe1003550
Cite this paper
More from this volume
- Human error and performance modeling with virtual operator model (HUNTER) synchronously coupled to Rancor Microworld Nuclear Power Plant Simulator
- A critical analysis of the concept of resilience skills from an enactivist perspective
- Digital Twin Verification for Advanced Reactor Remote Operations
- Synchronous vs. Asynchronous Coupling in the HUNTER Dynamic Human Reliability Analysis Framework
- Analysis of Tasks in Autonomous Systems Using the EMRALD Dynamic Risk Assessment Tool
- Japanese Practical Concepts on Human Error Prevention: 3H, 4M, and 5S
- What Fatality and "Prescott Way" Causal Factors Are Revealed in the July 23, 2013, Deployment Zone News Conference?
- Method for Enhancing Evaluation of the Human Error Probability in Disaster Risk Assessment for Industrial Plants


AHFE Open Access