“Hand-Over, Move-Over, Take-Over” – HoMoTo as a Holistic Method to Analyze Take-Over Scenarios
Abstract
Automated driving in Level 3 (SAE) allows the driver to temporarily devote his or her time to other activities (non-driving related activities, NDRA). If the system reaches its limits, take-overs back to Level 2 are mandatory. During the take-over phase, both the driver and the vehicle interior are in a state transition in order to regain a drivable condition. In Level 4, a complete and continuous devotion of the driver is possible and take-overs are not necessary by definition. Due to initial limited application areas, the use of Level 4 systems will initially also include take-overs. Then, the state transitions of driver and interior increase in complexity since a higher number and more variations of NDRAs are permitted. For the development and design of safe take-overs in automated vehicles, the prediction and assessment of the time required for these state transitions under different conditions, like NDRA and the associated body postures and interior adaption, is necessary. Currently, a procedure for describing and documenting the states and tasks of vehicle occupants and vehicle interior, and for the evaluation of positions and attitudes during the take-over does not exist. To close this gap, Schäffer et al. (2021) developed the method “Hand-Over, Move-Over, Take-Over” (HoMoTo). HoMoTo provides a description format of the driver's postures, movements, and cognitive states by dividing the take-over phase into subphases and subtasks. In this work, HoMoTo will be explained in detail with focus on the individual phases, steps, and influencing factors. Nevertheless, to obtain valid results further investigation of the procedure based on this work is necessary.
Keywords: Automated Driving, Take, Over, NDRA, Vehicle Interior, HoMoTo
DOI: 10.54941/ahfe1003810
Cite this paper
More from this volume
- Investigating the Influence of Perceived Anthropomorphism of Vehicles on Pedestrians’ Crossing Decisions in a Test Track Study
- Detection of Unconscious Movements with RGB-D Camera for Objective Ride Comfort Evaluation
- Development of an Adaptable Seating Buck for Ergonomic Vehicle Evaluation in a VR Environment
- Construction of evaluation index system for vehicle occupant's riding posture comfort
- Effect of Secondary Tasks in Touchscreen In-Vehicle Information System Operation on Driving Distraction
- Perspectives of Commuters on Electric Vehicles, Charging Infrastructure, and Communication Measures
- Interaction Design of Closed Dark Cabin Driving Interface based on Situation Awareness
- The effect of colored light in the vehicle interior on the thermal comfort and thermal responses of vehicle occupants
- Predictive Validity of the Vehicle Seat Comfort Score by Using the Seat Design and Testing Factors
- Autonomous shuttle or conventional cab? Investigating users’ decision to share a ride
- Who Will Drive Automated Vehicles? - Usability Context Analysis and Design Guidelines for Future Control Centers for Automated Vehicle Traffic
- Enhancing User Acceptance of Shared Automated Vehicles – An exploratory Study on Mobility Behavior and Attitude towards Automated Mobility Concepts


AHFE Open Access