Chinese Drivers’ Attitudes toward L2+ Level of Driving Automation
Abstract
In addition to SAE 6 levels of driving automation, the industry has introduced Level 2+ driving automation (L2+), which includes features such as Highway Driving Pilot (HDP), Automatic Parking Assist (APA), Valet Parking Assist (VPA) and Remote Parking Assist (RPA). A mixed-methods study was conducted to investigate the daily usage and attitudes of L2+ experienced drivers toward L2+ features. 395 L2+ experienced drivers in China participated in the on-line survey, and 11 of them joined successive validation interviews. The results show that HDP and APA are the most commonly used features. Drivers experience more fun with tech from using parking features, while HDP provide users with relaxing time. Safety concerns are the main reason why drivers do not use L2+ features, which in turn decreases usage and negatively correlates with performance-related reasons for not using them. These findings suggest that drivers hold divergent attitudes towards L2+ features, with a focus on safety or efficiency. Such findings can guide product design and customer education.
Keywords: Highway Driving Pilot, Automatic Parking Assist, Driving Automation, Customer Attitudes
DOI: 10.54941/ahfe1003831
Cite this paper
More from this volume
- Investigating the Influence of Perceived Anthropomorphism of Vehicles on Pedestrians’ Crossing Decisions in a Test Track Study
- Detection of Unconscious Movements with RGB-D Camera for Objective Ride Comfort Evaluation
- Development of an Adaptable Seating Buck for Ergonomic Vehicle Evaluation in a VR Environment
- Construction of evaluation index system for vehicle occupant's riding posture comfort
- Effect of Secondary Tasks in Touchscreen In-Vehicle Information System Operation on Driving Distraction
- Perspectives of Commuters on Electric Vehicles, Charging Infrastructure, and Communication Measures
- Interaction Design of Closed Dark Cabin Driving Interface based on Situation Awareness
- The effect of colored light in the vehicle interior on the thermal comfort and thermal responses of vehicle occupants
- Predictive Validity of the Vehicle Seat Comfort Score by Using the Seat Design and Testing Factors
- Autonomous shuttle or conventional cab? Investigating users’ decision to share a ride
- Who Will Drive Automated Vehicles? - Usability Context Analysis and Design Guidelines for Future Control Centers for Automated Vehicle Traffic
- Enhancing User Acceptance of Shared Automated Vehicles – An exploratory Study on Mobility Behavior and Attitude towards Automated Mobility Concepts


AHFE Open Access