Bidirectional Human-AI/Machine Collaborative and Autonomous Teams: Risk, Trust and Safety
Abstract
We address the bidirectional challenges in developing and managing interdependence for AI/machine collaboration in autonomous human-machine teams. Recent advances surrounding Large Language Models have increased apprehension in the public and among users about the next generation of AI for collaboration and human-machine teams. The anxieties that have grown regard the risk, trust, and safety from the potential uses of AI/machines in open environments, including unknown issues that might also arise. These concerns represent major hurdles to the development of verified and validated engineered systems involving bi-directionality across the human-machine frontier. Bi-directionality is a state of interdependence. It requires understanding the design and operational consequences that machine agents may have on humans, and, interdependently, the design and operational effects that humans may have on machine agents. Current discussions on human-AI interactions focus on the impact of AI on human stakeholders; potential ways of involving humans in computational interventions (e.g., human factors; data annotation; approval for drone actions); but these discussions overlook the interdependent need for a machine to intervene for dysfunctional humans (e.g., in 2015, the copilot aboard a Germanwings airliner committed suicide, killing all aboard; in 2023, a pilot ejected from an F-35, allowing the plane to fly unguided for an additional 60 miles). Technology is advancing rapidly: Self-driving cars; drones able to fly and land autonomously; self-landing reusable rockets; Air Force loyal wingmen. The technology is available today for bi-directional AI/machine collaboration and autonomous human-machine teams to better protect human life now and in the future. Thus, despite the engineering challenges faced, we believe that the technical challenges associated with humans and AI/machines cannot be adequately addressed if the social concerns related to risk, trust and safety caused by bi-directional forces are not also taken into consideration.
Keywords: Interdependence, autonomous, human-machine teams
DOI: 10.54941/ahfe1005014
Cite this paper
More from this volume
- Integrating Episodic and Semantic Memory in Machine Teammates to Enable Explainable After-Action Review and Intervention Planning in HAA Operations
- Navigating the Seas of Automation: Human-Informed Synthetic Data Augmentation for Enhanced Maritime Object Detection
- How Robot Arms can be used for Bin Picking and Shelf Picking
- 4-DOF Robotic Arm Simulator for Machine Operator Training and Performance Evaluation: Engineering Design and Experimental Validation
- An Update on International Robotic Wheelchair Development
- Requirements for Successful Human Robot Collaboration: Design Perspectives of Developers and Users in the Scope of the EU Horizon Project FELICE
- A Method for Human-Robot Collaborative Assembly Action Recognition Based on Skeleton Data and Transfer Learning
- Design a robot that is able to…: Gender stereotypes in children’s imagination of robots
- Combinatorial Effects of Unmanned Vehicles on Operator’s Mental Workload and Performance for Searching
- Re-expression of manual expertise through semi-automatic control of a teleoperated system
- Identification of management and supervision critical tasks for a multi-effector automated system. An applied cognitive approach
- Human Autonomy Teaming: proposition of a new model of trust


AHFE Open Access