Detecting High-Risk Fatigue: Tracking with Alertness and Physiological Metric Pattern
Abstract
Fatigue is a recognized factor contributing to safety incidents and reduced task performance. However, classifying fatigue levels among workers in the workplace is a challenging task due to its subjective nature. This study aimed to establish universal criteria for identifying high-risk levels of fatigue. Industrial settings commonly use risk management checklists for this purpose. This study analyzed the correlation between fatigue levels and physiological indicators associated with fatigue, including alertness levels. The alertness levels were measured by the psychomotor cognition test (PCT), and the physiological indicators included salivary C-reactive protein related to cumulative fatigue, blood lactate concentration related to physical fatigue, and salivary cortisol associated with mental fatigue. Subjective fatigue levels were categorized into five levels, with Level 1 representing optimal mental and physical conditions and Level 5 indicating severe fatigue. Results showed that the mean reaction time in PCT at Level 5 significantly increased, and the success rate sharply decreased, demonstrating a significant difference compared to Levels 1 and 2 (p<0.01). Blood lactate levels were exhibited a positive correlation with fatigue levels, sharply increasing from Level 4. Blood lactate levels in Levels 4 and 5 were significantly higher than those of Levels 1 and 2 (p<0.01). Salivary C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were also showed a rapid increase from Level 4, significantly higher than those of Levels 1 and 2 (p<0.001). Salivary cortisol concentration at Level 5, however, was relatively lower compared to those of Levels 1-4. In conclusion, cumulative fatigue and high-risk levels of fatigue due to excessive workload are reflected in vigilance tests and physiological indicators. These indicators can be valuable in reducing subjective biases when assessing fatigue levels. The study suggests that profiling vigilance tests and physiological indicators associated with fatigue can be employed to screen for high-risk fatigue levels.
Keywords: Fatigue, Alertness, CRP, Lactate, Cortisol
DOI: 10.54941/ahfe1005178
Cite this paper
More from this volume
- Comparing different ergonomic interventions to influence shelving practices in libraries
- Prediction of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in the Forest Sector Using Machine Learning Techniques
- Characteristics of muscle activity and joint dynamics during weight lifting by isotonic elbow flexion with assistive force
- Ergonomic risk assessment of sea fishermen part V: muscle fatigue in Sardinian pot fishing
- Daily Multidimensional Fatigue Scale and Physiological Indicators to minimize Subjective Bias in assessing Fatigue Levels
- Effect of variable cordless stick vacuum weights on discomfort in different body parts during floor vacuuming task
- AzKCLI: a semi-automatic tool for Compositive Lifting Index (CLI) evaluation through Azure Kinect
- Subjective feelings of physical and psychological workload among nurses in Poland – case study
- Exploring the Correlation Between Seat Backrest Angles and Motion Sickness Response in Ship Rocking Conditions
- Ergonomic risks at work and preventive measures for waste sorting operators and garbage collectors in waste sorting company
- HARI: A new approach to quantifying MSD risk factors for hands and fingers
- Ergonomic Work Environment Risks for Diesel Locomotive Drivers in Latvia and Health Promotion Measures


AHFE Open Access