Human Factors and Facial Recognition Technology in Emergency Response: An Integrative Review
Abstract
Facial Recognition Technology (FRT) has the potential to enhance emergency response by improving efficiency, reducing response times, and potentially saving lives. It is important to explore both the benefits and challenges of implementing FRT in emergency response protocols and identify the gaps in research on its application in emergency response. This integrative review collected articles from 2010 onwards through keyword searches in titles and abstracts across multiple databases, with inclusion and exclusion criteria applied, focusing on English-language peer-reviewed articles mentioning specific keywords related to emergency services and facial recognition. Data collection involved converting PDFs to plain text and coding--both human and non-human--for thematic analysis refined over rounds of close readings for accuracy. The results reveal positive and mixed findings regarding FRT in emergency response across various studies. Several methodologies were employed, including machine learning and deep learning techniques, achieving high accuracy rates in identifying individuals, particularly in scenarios like disaster rescue and masked-face recognition during the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies also evaluated FRT's effectiveness in disaster victim identification, safety systems integration, and medical applications, showcasing its potential across different contexts. However, limitations such as challenges in real-world deployment, concerns regarding privacy and bias, and the need for further validation and standardization were highlighted across the studies, indicating areas for future research and development to enhance the technology's efficacy and ethical use. The review emphasizes the importance of addressing technical, ethical, and governance challenges to deploy FRT effectively and responsibly in emergency response, serving as a valuable resource for stakeholders and researchers seeking to understand and advance the field.
Keywords: human factors, emergency response, facial recognition, integrative review
DOI: 10.54941/ahfe1005317
Cite this paper
More from this volume
- The use of protective hearing devices and perceived noise disturbance and social climate in open office environments
- Information ergonomics and factors related to sociotechnical environments of work among Ghanaian HE faculty members
- Fitting New Needs and Requests of Transport-Related Professions: The Freight Industry and Truck Drivers' Profession
- Ergonomic Risk Factors of Musculoskeletal Injuries in Aviation Maintenance
- Identification of Risk Factors in Work Environments with Ornamental Aquaculture Activities in Morelos
- Human Factors and Ergonomics in Patient Safety Within the Framework of Environmental, Social and Governance
- Self-reported noise sensitivity and perceived enjoyment of working in an open office environment
- Process improvement with AI in service industry: case studies
- Globalization, cultural pluralism and the formation of vocational identity in the world of “boundaryless” careers
- Immersive assistive technologies for knowledge transfer of crafts: Exploration and technical challenges
- Psychological Impacts of Different Organizational Cultures Toward Telecommuting on Workers
- Trust and satisfaction in the airline: Retention of skilled employees during COVID-19


AHFE Open Access