Video-based Ergonomic Risk Assessment among Transportation Maintenance Workers in Shoveling
Abstract
Shoveling is a physically demanding task that has resulted in various physical injuries, particularly affecting workers’ lower backs and shoulders. Specifically, shoveling gravel has been identified as one of the primary activities leading to common ergonomic injuries among transportation maintenance workers. Previous research has focused on evaluating the risks of ergonomic injuries from shoveling through simulations in the construction industry and field experiments in the agricultural industry. However, there is a lack of studies about the ergonomic risks associated with shoveling activities by field experiments within the transportation industry. In addition, prior studies have proposed some ergonomic solutions to prevent injuries in shoveling activity, such as ergonomic handles and back exoskeletons (EXOs). However, no research has yet provided a direct comparison of ergonomic risk levels when workers utilize different ergonomic solutions while shoveling. To address these gaps, this research evaluated the ergonomic risk levels associated with shoveling activity using different ergonomic solutions among 26 transportation maintenance workers. The ergonomic risk evaluation was conducted using the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) and Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) methods based on videos of their shoveling activities. Videos were recorded from October 3rd to October 17th, 2022. Each participant completed four trials of shoveling gravel, averaging around 97 minutes, using a regular shovel, a back EXO, an ergonomic handle, and both the back EXO and the ergonomic handle. Between each two subsequent trials, a 15-minute break was provided for participants to recover from the previous trials. Moreover, participants finished the four trials of shoveling gravel following the Balanced Latin Square order, in order to avoid the carry-over and order effects. During each trial, participants first shoveled broken gravel from the ground to the skid steer loader and cleaned any residual gravel from the ground in Part 1. Then, they shoveled new gravel from the asphalt hot box machine to the ground and patched it in Part 2. A 5-minute break between Part 1 and Part 2 was also offered to simulate the real-life practice. Results found that wearing a back EXO did not significantly reduce ergonomic risks during shoveling gravel, whereas the use of ergonomic handles and the combined use of the back EXO and ergonomic handle significantly decreased ergonomic risk scores during shoveling gravel. This study not only fills the gaps of ergonomic risk evaluation in real-world transportation maintenance activities, but also provides valuable insights for enhancing worker safety and efficiency in such environments.
Keywords: Transportation Maintenance, Ergonomics Risk Evaluation, Exoskeletons, Shoveling
DOI: 10.54941/ahfe1005718
Cite this paper
More from this volume
- Implementing an AI Fatigue Risk Management System for Aviation Maintenance SMS: A Technology Enhanced Critical Process Human Factors Safety Plan
- Deep Learning Forecast of Perceptual Load Using fNIRS Data
- Artificial intelligence in the function of improving port systems
- Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence for Built Environment Decision-Making
- Artificial Intelligence and Design: Innovation, Practical Applications, and Future Creative Horizons
- Supporting Informal Sustainability Learning with AI-assisted Educational Technology
- An assessment of the maintenance of heritage buildings using AI and IoT: a South African perspective
- What if we Could Entangle Drones? Towards the Management of a Swarm of Drones as a Non-Local Quantum Object
- Engaging All Elderly Residents in Community Renewal: Designer Spotlight Interview Tool for LLM Building
- AI Play in Higher Education: Students’ perceptions of play and co-creation of knowledge with generative AI
- Optimizing AI Involvement in Engineering University Courses Based on Students' Personality
- Predictive Model for Partner Agencies Dependency on Food Banks


AHFE Open Access