Patients over Process: Stratifying Risk in the Design, Development, and Deployment of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Abstract
The global focus on artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare and medicine is on the rise. Despite remarkable progress in integrating AI into clinical workflows, gaps in regulation remain a prevalent issue within healthcare systems. Effective regulation of artificial intelligence in clinical practice is essential for managing medico-legal risk and ensuring patient safety. Numerous studies highlight the significant potential for medico-legal risk and the need for clear guidelines on the ethical and safe use of AI in clinical practice. Although there are various concerns that these guidelines must address, our work focused on researching best practices regarding patient-centered factors like patient autonomy, trust and transparency, privacy and security, equity and fairness, and ensuring human oversight. While challenges in AI workflow integration arise from many factors, including human interactions and system inadequacies, the focus on individuals rather than the system has fostered an unsuitable culture for enhancing patient-centered care. Key focus areas include risk stratification strategies and increasing transparency within this inherently complex system, as they play a crucial role in guiding clinical decisions in patient management. Proper integration of AI regulatory frameworks into clinical practice is essential for addressing gaps in the design, development, deployment, and long-term monitoring of AI solutions. Globally, the regulation of AI in clinical practice is continually evolving as governments and legal systems adapt to the rapid advances in AI as a medical device (AIaMD). In Canada, a strategic path forward prioritizes federal and provincial regulations; however, at this stage, they remain fragmented. We advocate for the establishment of uniform guidelines that address the risks, benefits, opportunities, and best practices as AI technologies are integrated into the clinical workflow. Achieving a national standard with clear guidance on the ethical and safe use of AI in clinical practice is recommended to move forward.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Healthcare, Clinical Practice, Patient-Centered Care
DOI: 10.54941/ahfe1006190
Cite this paper
More from this volume
- The Accuracy of the Eye Tracking in a Virtual Reality Headset for Possible Research and Clinical Applications
- Human Factors in an Agile Environment: Capturing Value in Healthcare
- Enhanced Fall Prevention in Nursing Facilities: Assisting Caregivers through Data-Driven Selective Monitoring and Notification
- Examining the Efficacy of an Improved CanSim for Quantifying Hemodialysis Cannulation Skills
- Human Factors Engineering and User- centered Design Principles in the Design and Development of Device Combination Products for Special Patients Populations
- Using Design Thinking to Improve Student Feedback in Healthcare Simulation
- Elicitation of risk perception strategies in emergency rooms based on KYT technique and eye tracking stimulated retrospections
- Advancing Scoliosis Treatment: Development and Evaluation of Anisotropic Textile Brace (ATB) for Enhanced Patient Compliance
- Biological evaluation of antimicrobial treated textiles
- Ergonomic investigation on Interventional Radiology in the era of robotic surgery
- Self-monitoring of blood glucose: The perception of physicians who care for older adults in a health service in Mexico
- Socio-Technical Risk Analysis for the Digitalized Transfusion Process: the e-TRAST Tool


AHFE Open Access