Designing the interaction with Intelligent Decision Support Systems in Control Rooms: Challenges, Strategies, and Insights for Railway Applications
Abstract
Control rooms are critical environments for monitoring and managing complex socio-technical systems across industries such as transportation, energy, and public safety. Decision Support Systems (DSS) play a pivotal role in assisting operators by processing vast amounts of data, streamlining decision-making processes, and reducing response times. The integration of AI into DSS, creating Intelligent DSS, introduces new challenges, particularly regarding explainability and trustworthiness. Operators must not only interpret complex AI-driven recommendations but also rely on them in high-stakes, time-critical scenarios. For instance, intelligent alarm management systems in railway control rooms are designed to help operators prioritize, filter, and manage alarm floods, reducing cognitive overload. However, their effectiveness heavily depends on aligning with operators' cognitive needs, maintaining situational awareness, and fostering trust in automated recommendations. This context presents new significant challenges for designing effective interactions between control room systems and operators, that differently for the back-end AI-based DSS solutions, remain less clearly defined. This gap complicates the development of clear strategies for ergonomic interaction design and their subsequent assessment. This study addresses these challenges through a systematic literature review, focusing on works within the domains of human factors and ergonomics. The review explores the following research questions: What are the main ergonomic issues identified in the current state of the art regarding operator interaction with Intelligent DSS in control rooms? What are the key interaction strategies proposed to address these issues, and what performance indicators have been identified? Performance indicators are defined operationally and accompanied by detailed methodologies for their calculation, ensuring their applicability to other design projects. These indicators include measures encompassing both objective and subjective aspects, related to situational awareness metrics, and trust in AI systems. By synthesizing research perspectives and providing actionable guidelines, this study offers a foundational reference for ergonomic design efforts in control room environments. It seeks to overcome current limitations and advance the development of safer, more efficient, and operator-friendly systems, with a particular focus on railway applications.
Keywords: Control rooms, Intelligent Decision Support Systems, Railway, Human Computer Interaction
DOI: 10.54941/ahfe1006541
Cite this paper
More from this volume
- Investigating Relationships Between First Solo Hours and Overall Flight Training Performance for Part 141 Flight Students
- Some of our CVR data are missing: 92 airline accidents & incidents 2014–2024
- Mayday, Mayday! - Is Heart Rate Variability a Suitable Objective Indicator to Detect Pilot’s Increased Mental Workload in Emergency Situations?
- Investigating the Acceptance of Vertiport Construction Near Residence Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
- Digital Assistant Concept for Enroute Air Traffic Management
- Triggers and Consequences: A Multidimensional Analysis of the Rebound Effect in Sustainable Design
- User-Driven Strategies to Enhance Cockpit Comfort in New Energy Vehicles
- Flexible Human-Machine Collaboration: The Concept and Case Study of Lunar Surface Exploration Task
- Flight Safety - Alcohol Detection assisted by AI Facial Recognition Technology
- Safety and Human Factors Challenges of Aircraft Berths: Problem Analysis and Optimization Approaches
- Exploring the Impact of Factors on Upper Limb Functional Space and Operational Efficiency: A Theoretical Analysis
- The Implementation of AI in Aviation Accidents Investigations


AHFE Open Access