Technology and environmental design for the safety of people with autism
Abstract
People with autism need a safe environment, free from potential risks and that facilitates movement so that they can continue to perform their tasks and maximize their abilities (FLEMING; ZEISEL; BENNETT, 2020). This study aimed to explore the safety measures implemented by family members of people with autism in the home environment. An exploratory, descriptive, and qualitative study, approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital das Clínicas of the Ribeirão Preto Medical School of the University of São Paulo, in which 26 caregivers of people with autism participated. Data were collected through in-depth interviews. The study questions were based on environmental adaptations for well-being and safety measures adopted. The main thematic categories identified were: Modifications in environmental design and Technology resources. The category "Modifications in environmental design" generated the subcategories "Access Control Strategies" and "Modification of structure and rearrangement of furniture." Access control modifications included the installation of gates and keyed doors to isolate rooms and control access to medicines, plants, and animal feed. Regarding structural strategies, accessibility features were adopted, such as leveling the floor and removing steps, installing ramps, handrails, corner guards, and grab bars, removing shower stalls, widening doorways and passageways, installing non-slip flooring, and installing safety screens and nets, among others. Furniture and rugs were removed to increase free space and reduce environmental risks. Technology features included the installation of surveillance cameras, assistive devices such as shower chairs, bed safety rails, motion sensors, furniture corner guards, and floor signage, as well as increased supervision and surveillance. The main changes are based on the fact that 20 of these subjects were children living with autism and had no perception of the potential risk of the environment. Safety is the most frequently adopted measure for environments in which neurotypical individuals live, taking into account their cognitive, sensory, experiential, and sociodemographic specificities (Lee, 2022). Conclusion: Knowledge about the specific needs of a group of individuals should inform design and technology choices that can contribute to a full life in a safe and functional environment.
Keywords: Environmental design, technology, security, autism.
DOI: 10.54941/ahfe1006803
Cite this paper
More from this volume
- Disaster Situation Understanding and Management by Using Common Ontology and Semantics
- Layer Model for the Design of Data-driven Business Models – AI Integration and Industrial Data Fusion Across Hierarchical Levels
- Tracking Human Factor Recognition in Occupational Accident Investigations: A 10-Year Review from the Quarrying and Aggregates Sector
- From Clinic to Space and Back Again: A Neuroadaptive Systems Approach to Optimized Human Performance
- A quantitative assessment approach for user operation performance grounded in cognitive models
- Usability Issues in BPMN Models Analyzed Using Eye-Tracking Technology
- CoBotCraftLab – Approaching Human-Robot Collaboration in Digital Craft
- Business Analytics Strategies in Port Economics from a Systems-Theory Perspective: A Bibliometric Analysis and Future Research Directions
- Customer Experience and Social Robots - an experiment in a grocery store
- Strategic Transformation towards Advanced Mechanical Engineering: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy of Trends and Enabling Factors
- Securing Interfaces of a Multinational Standard with Technical Specifications for Data Sharing: Challenges of Authentication and Authorization
- Impact of Pedal Design Parameters on Operational Efficiency and Usability in Foot Interaction Systems


AHFE Open Access