Human Factors for Machine Learning in Astronomy
Abstract
In this work, we present a collection of human-centered pitfalls that can occur when using machine learning tools and techniques in modern astronomical research, and we recommend best practices in order to mitigate these pitfalls. Human concerns affect the adoption and evolution of machine learning (ML) techniques in both existing workflows and work cultures. We use current and future surveys such as ZTF and LSST, the data that they collect, and the techniques implemented to process that data as examples of these challenges and the potential application of these best practices, with the ultimate goal of maximizing the discovery potential of these surveys.
Keywords: astronomy, machine learning, human factors, trust, reproducibility, bias
DOI: 10.54941/ahfe1003580
Cite this paper
More from this volume
- Team Plan Recognition: A Review of the State of the Art
- Beyond the tool vs. teammate debate: Exploring the sidekick metaphor in human-AI dyads
- Measurement and Manipulation in Human-Agent Teams: A Review
- Measuring Trust in a Simulated Human Agent Team Task
- The Role of Artificial Theory of Mind in Supporting Human-Agent Teaming Interactions
- Evolution of Workload Demands of the Control Room with Plant Technology
- Characterizing Complexity: A Multidimensional Approach to Digital Control Room Display Research
- Evaluation of a Basic Principle SMR Simulator for Experimental Human Performance Research Studies
- Behavioral indicators - an approach for assessing nuclear control room operators’ excessive cognitive workload?
- Transfer of nuclear maintenance skills from virtual environments to reality - Toward a methodological guide
- A Proposed Methodology to Assess Cognitive Overload using an Augmented Situation Awareness System
- Assessment of pilots' training efficacy as a safety barrier in the context of Enhanced Flight Vision Systems (EFVS)


AHFE Open Access