Coordinating Asset Owner and PSIRT for CRA Vulnerability Recognition: Evidence-Based Mechanisms from Coordination Theory
Abstract
The EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) requires manufacturers to provide early warning within 24 hours, detailed notification within 72 hours, and final reporting within 14 days after corrective measures become available, upon becoming aware of actively exploited vulnerabilities (Article 14). However, the evidence necessary to establish awareness exists primarily in asset owner environments, and asset owners bear no reporting obligation. This creates a structural coordination challenge: manufacturers require evidence they cannot independently access, and fixed reporting deadlines commence upon awareness. This study applies Malone & Crowston's coordination theory to identify three dependency relationships: bidirectional knowledge asymmetry (producer-consumer relationship) between asset owners who hold evidence and PSIRTs who hold product knowledge; time allocation (shared resource) under fixed reporting deadlines (24h/72h/14d); and misalignment between different objectives (task-subtask dependency). We propose a three-layer mechanism for managing these dependencies. C0 (Reachability) provides reporting channels. C1 (Evidence Coordination Profile) decomposes Article 3(42) awareness definition into five propositions and structures evidence into four categories (E1-E4), enabling the establishment of awareness and phased reporting. C2 (Incentive Design) converts asset owners’ voluntary cooperation into organizational security improvement through three benefits. These three mechanisms mutually reinforce each other to achieve continuous coordination. Theoretically, this extends the coordination theory to regulatory compliance contexts in which coordination is voluntary. Practically, it provides implementable guidance for manufacturers facing CRA enforcement by 2027.
Keywords: Cyber Resilience Act, PSIRT, Coordination Theory, Vulnerability Recognition, Reporting Obligation, Voluntary Cooperation, Evidence-Based Coordination
DOI: 10.54941/ahfe1007041
Cite this paper
More from this volume
- Warnings and Multilingual Audiences
- EAT Da Vinci 3.0_Translating Cinematic Narrative into Media Art Installation
- From Manual to Automated: Enhancing Inclusivity in Foreign Language Education with Technology
- The effect of multi-sensory physical experiences in daily emotional self-tracking service for emotion self-awareness
- Parametric generation based graphic design and spatial expression research
- Gender Stereotypes in Video Gaming: Impacts of Anxiety Levels, Verbal Communication, and Performance
- Exploring Usability And User-experience Metrics With A Novel AR App In The MASTERLY Project
- Drawing Dialogues Between Generative AI and Children with Autism: A Qualitative Study on the Externalization of “Understanding”
- Human-Centered Design of Integrated Food Service Management Systems: Reducing Cognitive Load in Resource-Constrained Kitchen Operations
- The Design Futures Art-driven (DFA) Method: Structuring Art-Tech Collaboration for Sustainable Future of Food System
- Increasing importance of Instinct
- Bridging the Privacy Gap: Stakeholder Solutions to Support Transparent Data Management Practices in Digital Health Research


AHFE Open Access