Narrative as a Cognitive Scaffold for Human-Centered Design Education:A Case Study of Schema Change in Interaction Design Students
Abstract
Human-centered design (HCD) education has long faced a gap: while students can readily produce ideas, they struggle to integrate scattered concepts into coherent interaction design works. This study examines whether narrative pedagogy can help interaction design students develop such integrative cognitive capacity, with two aims: (1) to analyze how students' creativity schemas across the four ION dimensions change under narrative pedagogical intervention, and (2) to examine the role of narrative pedagogy as a cognitive scaffold in shaping students' design thinking. The study adopts Kim's CATs model as its primary framework, using ION thinking combined with Creative Attitudes, and draws on Meisiek et al.'s schema-change modes for describing cognitive change. Situated in an eight-week Story Creativity and Narrative Design course at National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Taiwan, this qualitative multiple-case study tracked three interaction design students through pre-, mid-, and post-course semi-structured interviews, with intercoder reliability checked across three independent coders. Findings reveal changes across all four dimensions: the basis for judging work shifted from personal feeling to design purpose; the starting point for ideation shifted from direct personal association to first defining the audience and then constructing content; the way of organizing design elements shifted from juxtaposition to causal chaining; the use of emotion and playfulness shifted from passive reception to active deployment for conveying messages. Among these, metaphorical thinking was the only capability emerging during the course, while others were refined mid-course and internalized post-course, persisting after the instructor's scaffolding was withdrawn — this temporal pattern provides concrete empirical support for the claim of narrative as scaffold, and this structure aligns with the integrative capacity required by interaction design practice. The study therefore argues that narrative in HCD education should be reframed from a communication skill to a scaffold for design cognition; for design educators, this means narrative practice can serve as a practical pedagogical intervention for cultivating integrative design capacity.
Keywords: Narrative Pedagogy, Cognitive Scaffolding, Design Process, Schema Change, Human-Centered Design Education, Qualitative Case Study
DOI: 10.54941/ahfe1008082
Cite this paper
More from this volume
- Explainability in Automated Driving: From Spatial Attention to Human-Centred Reasoning
- Design and Evaluation of an AI Academic Advisor: Insights from Student Interactions
- To boldly go where AI must not go alone: Designing for non-delegable human authority in AI-assisted expert work
- Integrating Three Modalities into One Experience: A Case Study of 2024 DigiWave—DdDd
- Improving Usability in a Smart Building Ecosystem through Heuristic Evaluation and Usability Testing
- Anchored in the Learner: A Critical Review of AI Discourse in Design Education
- Assessment-Before-Intervention: A WHO iSupport-Grounded Conversational AI System for Dementia Family Caregiver Support
- Analyzing Stress and Perceived Safety in Human-Cobot Collaboration: The Impact of Task Proximity, Interface Cues, and System Errors
- Metascience of content-based cognitive ergonomics
- Developing an Assistive Mobile Application for Elderly Nepali Migrants in the UK
- Integrated Home Service Robots for Ageing in Place: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on Acceptance and Care Needs in Taiwan
- From Retrieval to Verification: An Agentic Framework for Rule-Aware Engineering Document Compliance


AHFE Open Access