Ethical Dilemmass and Regulations of Artificial Intelligence Under the Perspective of Nietzsche’s Superman Philosophy Based on the Alien: Romulus
Abstract
The paper analyzes the ethical dilemmas and regulations of AI from five perspectives, grounded in Nietzsche's Übermensch philosophy. The aim is to provide theoretical support and multiple case studies for the establishment of an ethical order in AI. Firstly, it addresses kinship ethics dilemmas and regulations concerning AI within the context of dual ethics. This section examines the ethical challenges posed by AI through both human-centric and alien-centric lenses. It raises critical questions regarding whether kinship ethics should be predicated on a clear distinction between humans and animals. Secondly, it explores social ethics dilemmas and regulations related to AI against the backdrop of artificial ethics and professional standards. Ethical judgments alongside legal boundaries give rise to significant social ethical challenges associated with AI. The technology exacerbates social inequalities while undermining principles of equal opportunity. This segment poses essential inquiries about whether social ethics necessitate that AI assumes certain social responsibilities, as well as what specific forms these responsibilities should take. Should we redefine social ethics based on fairness when individual circumstances are similar, or justice when they differ? Thirdly, it delves into political ethics dilemmas and regulations pertaining to AI within contexts shaped by imagery suggestions and ethical reinforcements. Using Alien: Romulus as a case study, this section discusses how one might explore the moral imagination surrounding AI driven by its moral autonomy through visual representations. It raises pertinent questions about whether loyalty and integrity constitute political or ethical obligations that must be addressed by AI systems. Fourthly, national ethics dilemmas concerning regulation of AI are examined in light of digital transformation processes and advancements in technological security development. This part prompts reflection on whether a great power’s responsibilities represent a matter of national ethics for AI. Finally, the ethical dilemmas surrounding Earth and the regulation of AI within the framework of bioethics and ethical care are examined. This paper poses the question of whether concepts such as co-assistance, co-integration, co-sharing, and co-prosperity represent essential issues of Earth ethics that AI must address.
Keywords: Nietzsche's Übermensch philosophy, Ethical Dilemmass and Regulations, Alien: Romulus
DOI: 10.54941/ahfe1006215
Cite this paper
More from this volume
- Data-Driven Insights into Diabetes-Related Hospital Readmissions in the United States: Trends and Predictors
- A Sliding-Window Batched Framework: Optimizing Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) for Trustworthy AI under the EU AI Act
- A Method of Structured Standard Terminology Based on Decoupling Approach
- Convo-Based Attitude Analysis of Twitter Big Data: A Case Study on Ukraine-Russia War Dataset
- Smart Cities: are they really accessible and truly smart?
- AI Optimization of Resolution Strategy in Utility Billing and Revenue Assurance
- Behavioural Intentions of Natural Farming Farmers to Adopt Digital Platforms for Purchasing Inputs: A Structural Equation Modeling-Based Multi-Group Analysis
- AIToys: A conceptual definition and future research agenda
- FITMag: A Framework for Generating Fashion Journalism Using Multimodal LLMs, Social Media Influence, and Graph RAG
- Challenges and Opportunities in E-commerce Distribution Networks in Johannesburg.
- Revolutionizing Logistics Management with Blockchain Technology
- Interpretable AI-Generated Videos Detection using Deep Learning and Integrated Gradients


AHFE Open Access