Understanding Cognitive Factors for the Choice of Physical Controls for in-Vehicle Content Accessibility
Abstract
Automobiles become more capable of supporting our everyday lives. They are used not just for driving but also for communication and online content; playing music from the radio, from the internet, and from the phone connected, for example. However, designing accessible controls in-vehicle has been challenging due to the limitations of the in-vehicle interface. The space for physical control is limited, while the information architecture and menu structure of the user interface become complicated, as more controls and contents are provided. Finding the balanced HMI model for physical vs. screen-based virtual control is necessary to achieve satisfactory vehicle content accessibility. In this study, we used a similarity matrix to understand the underlying structure of content accessibility. Forty-eight participants were recruited and voluntarily reviewed their own vehicle in terms of content accessibility with VCAG (including NHTSA distraction guidelines), followed by sorting the physical buttons. The findings illustrate the choice model of vehicle content/control accessibility. Discussion will follow on psychophysical and preferential judgements in in-vehicle content accessibility. The updated VCAG testing methods and procedures will be provided.
Keywords: Physical Controls, In-vehicle Accessibility, Method Of Elimination
DOI: 10.54941/ahfe1007309
Cite this paper
More from this volume
- Foldness: A Measurement Index for Building Facade Richness in Old Residential Areas and Evaluation of Urban Spatial Vitality
- Echo: A Human–Computer Collaborative Design of an Intelligent Object-Finding System for the Visually Impaired
- SeeBeyond: An AI-Powered Mobile AR System for Context-Aware Color Assistance
- Voluntary Product Accessibility Templates: Who Watches the Watchmen?
- Blind and Low Vision Users’ Experience with AI-Infused Banking Chatbots: AI-Specific Experience Dimensions and System Usability
- Evaluating the Acceptance of Computer-Assisted Interpreting Tools Using the Technology Acceptance Model
- Both insufficient adjustment and selective accessibility exist in the anchoring effect: evidence from eye dynamics in estimation tasks
- When Is Congruence Optimal? Impression-Dependent Effects of Product-Avatar Matching in VR Commerce
- Exploring the User Experience of Virtual Reality in Displaying and Learning High-Risk Home Appliances
- "Simply": AI-Powered Browser Extension to Support People with Learning Disabilities
- Beyond Assistive and Educational Technologies: The Emergence of Educational Assistive Technology
- Effects of Auditory–Tactile Rhythmic Cueing on Gait Parameters in Older Adults


AHFE Open Access