Construction and Validation of a Multi-Level Evaluation System for Mattress Comfort
Abstract
Robust mattress comfort evaluation is essential for translating human-mattress interaction evidence into actionable product design requirements; however, current studies and standards often use non-aligned indicator sets and frequently treat comfort as a static, single-time-point construct. This study developed and validated a hierarchical, human-centered evaluation system that integrates subjective perceptions with objective interface pressure metrics and explicitly differentiates early- and later-phase comfort perceptions. Based on a systematic literature review and relevant standards (e.g., GB/T 43007-2023; EN 1957), candidate indicators were refined through expert ratings (n = 5) and redundancy screening, yielding a four-level framework (goal–dimension–primary–secondary) comprising three dimensions, six primary indicators, and ten secondary indicators. A controlled within-subject experiment was then conducted with 28 adults (19 normal-weight; 9 overweight/obese; 14 males and 14 females; 21–36 years) who evaluated soft, medium, and firm mattresses using a 5-point Likert scale (−2 to +2) while supine interface pressure was recorded at 5 min (early phase) and 30 min (later phase). The questionnaire showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.82) and content validity (CVI = 0.86). Across both body types, medium firmness yielded the highest mean ratings for later-phase overall comfort and fatigue relief. Whole-body pressure metrics showed limited associations with overall comfort, whereas regional pressure parameters, particularly in the shoulder and waist, exhibited clearer and body-type-dependent relationships with comfort-related ratings. The proposed system provides a structured basis for standardized comfort assessment and supports region-specific (zonal) mattress optimization.
Keywords: Mattress Comfort, Two-phase Assessment, Hierarchical Evaluation, Interface Pressure Mapping, Zonal Mattress Design
DOI: 10.54941/ahfe1007446
Cite this paper
More from this volume
- A Two-Phase Asynchronous–Synchronous Online Co-Design Method for Facilitating Multistakeholder Participation in Healthcare Technology
- Mapping Experiential Values of Office Chairs: Insights from Qualitative Observations
- Envisioning Uncertain Futures: A Structured Framework for Speculative Co-design Workshops
- Psychological Mechanism and Classification of Similarity Judgment in Design:Expert Interviews and Questionnaire Survey
- Integrating Embodied Intelligence: A Three-Scenario Design Proposal for the Smart Vehicle Cabin
- Gender Sensitive Ergonomic Evaluation of a Disposable Ureteroscope Handle
- Cross-Cultural Impressions and Cue Weighting of Avatars for Emergency Announcements: Evidence from China and Japan
- An Examination of Factors Contributing to the Perception of Chairs "Blending into" a Space and Their Respective Contributions
- An Empirical Examination of Optimal Stimulation Theory and Prototype Theory for the Perceived Fit of Chairs in Office Spaces
- Grey Relational Analysis of Bicycle Saddle Modeling Based on Kansei Engineering
- A Product Redesign Approach Based on Negative Text Mining and Kansei Engineering
- Exploring Consumer Taste by Award-Winning Product Designers via the Elite Interview


AHFE Open Access