Design and Workflow in Single-Family NICU Rooms: Examining Flow Disruptions in Infant Care
Abstract
Neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are uniquely complex settings, where families and clinicians navigate workflows shaped by sophisticated medical technology and safety risks surrounding fragile infants. To enhance developmental care, many NICUs have transitioned toward the Single-Family Room (SFR) design model, treating patients in private rooms. Compared to open bay layouts, SFRs have shown increased infection control and family participation in care. Despite these benefits, relatively little is known about how SFR design characteristics introduce safety risks to infant care, especially considering the increased family involvement in care tasks such as Kangaroo care and infant feeding. These tasks can be cognitively and physically demanding, especially for families, and carry substantial risk of infection, traumatic injury and medical errors. While design may potentially minimize flow disruptions and risks in healthcare tasks, evidence is scarce from the built environment perspective, especially in the NICU. We conducted a study to identify how specific SFR features such as room size, layout, and equipment/furniture design can influence disruptions in the flow of infant care tasks jointly performed by families and staff. Using an exploratory approach, we conducted two online focus groups and a case study involving field observations and interviews, thematically analysing the data. Findings revealed 11 types of design-related flow disruptions in the SFR, categorized as high and low risk. Flow disruptions were linked to SFR layout, storage and surface organization, infant bed clearances, cord management, and furniture/equipment design. Findings also revealed physical mechanisms involved in these flow disruptions, laying foundation for future research.
Keywords: Healthcare Design, Built Environment, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), Safety, Single-family Room, Flow Disruptions
DOI: 10.54941/ahfe1007479
Cite this paper
More from this volume
- Assessing Digital Readiness in Diagnostic and Clinical Pathology: A Human Factors Approach
- Human Factors in AI-Driven Antimicrobial Stewardship: Clinician Decision-Making, Automation Bias, and Patient Safety Risks
- Assessing Hospital Patient Nutrient Intake with an AI-Powered Food Recognition System – A Feasibility Study of the FlavoriaFlex solution
- When One in a Million Matters: Developing Metrics for Human-AI Collaboration in Rare Disease Diagnosis
- NecKorrect: Customisation Ergonomic Interventions for Cervical Spine Health
- Modular Organ Aging Framework in the Real World: Cost, Frequency, Equity, and a Patient-Facing Calculator
- Automated Hemostasis in Limb Trauma: FEM Insights for Tourniquet Optimisation
- Individual Performance Analytics in a Virtual Reality Simulation for Medication and Medical Supply Storage: An Experience Report
- An Ergonomic Perspective on Cortisol, Cardiovascular Risk, and Anxiety in Full- Time Faculty Workers
- Exploring Patient Safety Awareness and Risk Perception Among Clinical Staff and Inpatients
- VR Games as a Complementary Tool for Upper Limb Rehabilitation: A Biomechanical and Usability Analysis
- Therapeutic Applications of Remote Aviation (T.A.R.A.): A Neuroergonomic Framework for Aerially Mediated Cognitive-Affective Modulation


AHFE Open Access