Risk Assessment in a Biotechnology Laboratory Using the EMKG Method: Guide to Best Practices and Procedures
Abstract
Information on the production of biomaterials through electrospinning has been reported; however, it is necessary to ensure the safety of students, teachers, and researchers who may be inadvertently exposed to biomaterials during laboratory tasks such as weighing, solution preparation, polymer solution loading, and cleaning. Aim: The aim is to contribute to increasing knowledge in this area by assessing the hygiene risks of activities involving hazardous substances in the biomaterials laboratory where scaffolds with potential biomedical applications are produced. Method and materials: The occupational risk assessment was performed according to EMKG Tools Workplace & Chemicals due to its ease of use, speed, and clarity compared to COSHH and INRS methods. Accessible parameters are used to estimate hazards and associate them with control strategies, which are implemented using the control guide (operating procedures and solution preparation protocol). Of the thirty-five chemicals used in the biomaterials laboratory, the following nine were assessed using the EMKG method: dimethylformamide, acetic acid, acetonitrile, methanol, hexane, lithium chloride, acetone, and ethanol, considering their respective Safety Data Sheets (SDS). Exposure estimates were based on parameters such as effective area, contact duration, quantity group, release group, and control strategy. Results: Of the nine chemicals identified, dimethylformamide and chloroform were classified as risk level 3, representing a significant hazard. Acetic acid, acetonitrile, methanol, hexane, and lithium chloride were classified as risk level 2, indicating the need for technical and organizational measures. Finally, acetone and ethanol were assigned a risk level 1, in line with good laboratory practices. Conclusions: Hygienic risks for teachers, students, and researchers were identified during laboratory activities, even when substances were used at low concentrations. Therefore, it is essential to implement measures that standardize procedures and minimize the possibility of unwanted incidents.
Keywords: Biotechnology Laboratory, Biomaterials, Occupational Hygiene, Safety Procedures
DOI: 10.54941/ahfe1007911
Cite this paper
More from this volume
- Development of the Fear of Work-Related Accident Scale: Pilot Study and Content Validity Findings
- Risk Factors Contributing to Slips, Trips, and Falls Among Truck Drivers: Evidence from Canada
- Effects of Visual Display Terminal Refresh Rate on Game Performance and Visual Fatigue of Casual Players
- Evaluation of working posture using the Xsens inertial system in production in accordance with Czech legislation
- Failure of roller coaster safety management at amusement parks
- How are the Nov. 1, 1966 Loop Fire Fatalities Tied Into the Overall Fire Shelter Movement Concealing the Truths About Other Fatal and Near-Fatal Fires?
- From incident narratives to actionable controls: insights on the iron & steel industry using LLM assisted learning from incident databases
- Misinformation Risk: Epidemiological and Social Models
- Engineering Safe Human-Autonomy Teaming in Swarm Drone Simulator Applications Using System-Theoretic Process Analysis extended for Coordination
- Training and Assessing Hazard Perception in High-Risk Occupations: Toward an AI-Driven Adaptive and Immersive Simulation
- Development of a Comparative Framework for identifying the Optimal Process Safety Management (PSM) System using a Hybrid AHP-PROMETHEE Model.
- Collaborative Robotics and Worker Safety: An Ergonomic Perspective on Benefits and Risks


AHFE Open Access