Human Error and Artificial Intelligence Interaction in Occupational Safety
Abstract
The study begins with a brief overview of the concept of artificial intelligence, which is now closely affecting individuals, social life, and all sectors. It then examines the development process of artificial intelligence, its areas of application, and the impact of the Internet of Things technology—which is increasingly being integrated into new applications—on the new generation of humans. It also emphasizes the importance of adopting a hybrid approach that combines machines' automation power with humans' ethical, intuitive, and contextual competencies for a sustainable and reliable future. Artificial intelligence, which has been rapidly accepted in professional work life and personal life, has created risks and problems both in specific sectors and in individuals' private lives, alongside its effects of simplifying life and increasing quality in every area. Despite concerns that human behaviour inherently carries greater risk than machine behaviour, analyses of errors made by artificial intelligence and errors made by humans reveal that, despite commonalities, the types, probabilities, effects, and consequences of these two types of errors differ significantly. For example, it is believed that the current capabilities of artificial intelligence technologies are insufficient to meet certain critical human competencies. It is seen that human-specific qualities such as ethical evaluation, contextual analysis, creative problem solving, and strategic reasoning cannot be fully performed by artificial intelligence. The biggest challenge facing artificial intelligence stems from the fact that a significant percentage of the data on which AI systems rely comes from humans. Such data is largely the result of the irrationality and subjectivity of people acting in their own self-interest. Human errors can be skill-based, rule-based, or knowledge-based. Skill-based errors are application errors, while the other two are planning-based. Studies show that most human errors are skill-based, such as carelessness and inattention, and are more likely to be detected. As a result, artificial intelligence should continue to be a complement in areas where the human factor is critically important and should maintain its indispensability. The proportion of human error is much greater than the proportion of artificial intelligence errors. And fundamentally, the source of artificial intelligence errors is human error. To mitigate their effects, investments are needed to improve error detection for both types of errors. As both humans and machines evolve, the likelihood of new errors emerging increases, while the likelihood of old errors persisting decreases, necessitating adequate risk management efforts.
Keywords: Occupational Health And Safety, Human Error, Artificial Intelligence Errors, Artificial Intelligence
DOI: 10.54941/ahfe1007926
Cite this paper
More from this volume
- Risk Assessment in a Biotechnology Laboratory Using the EMKG Method: Guide to Best Practices and Procedures
- Development of the Fear of Work-Related Accident Scale: Pilot Study and Content Validity Findings
- Risk Factors Contributing to Slips, Trips, and Falls Among Truck Drivers: Evidence from Canada
- Effects of Visual Display Terminal Refresh Rate on Game Performance and Visual Fatigue of Casual Players
- Evaluation of working posture using the Xsens inertial system in production in accordance with Czech legislation
- Failure of roller coaster safety management at amusement parks
- How are the Nov. 1, 1966 Loop Fire Fatalities Tied Into the Overall Fire Shelter Movement Concealing the Truths About Other Fatal and Near-Fatal Fires?
- From incident narratives to actionable controls: insights on the iron & steel industry using LLM assisted learning from incident databases
- Misinformation Risk: Epidemiological and Social Models
- Engineering Safe Human-Autonomy Teaming in Swarm Drone Simulator Applications Using System-Theoretic Process Analysis extended for Coordination
- Training and Assessing Hazard Perception in High-Risk Occupations: Toward an AI-Driven Adaptive and Immersive Simulation
- Development of a Comparative Framework for identifying the Optimal Process Safety Management (PSM) System using a Hybrid AHP-PROMETHEE Model.


AHFE Open Access