An Adversarial Dual-Agent Critical Framework for Intelligent Evaluation and Optimization of Human–Computer Interaction Design

Open Access
Article
Conference Proceedings
Authors: Jiaqi HanPeiyan Zhong
Abstract

Critical thinking is a core practice in the field of human-computer interaction and design, aiming to enhance the quality of interaction solutions in multiple dimensions such as experience, technology, and ethics through systematic review. Existing research lacks collaborative deduction and in-depth demonstration of HCI schemes at the behavioral logic, engineering implementation and comprehensive risk levels. This leads to the difficulty in improving love, with feedback remaining superficial and fragmented, making it hard to support high-quality innovation and decision-making in a complex and dynamic interactive context. This paper proposes an adversarial design critical framework based on dual agents. This framework consists of two adversarial agents: (1) Experience Optimization Agent: This agent takes user experience as the core evaluation dimension and quantitatively analyzes the intuitiveness, operational efficiency, and user emotional feedback of the design plan based on interaction design principles, cognitive psychology models, and input user expectations. (2) Constraint Verification Agent: This agent takes technical feasibility and actual conditions as the evaluation dimensions, and based on implementation cost, performance indicators, multi-terminal adaptation requirements and basic design specifications, identifies technical implementation risks, performance defects and compliance issues existing in the design scheme. The results of user experiments show that, compared with traditional schemes, the framework constructed in this paper demonstrates outstanding performance in human-computer interaction tasks, significantly enhancing the comprehensive adoption rate of the generated suggestions, and showing efficient early warning capabilities for key design issues such as logical contradictions and imbalance of resource benefits. The collaborative evaluation mechanism effectively reduces the cognitive load generated when dealing with multi-dimensional feedback, enabling designers to focus more on core design decisions. In complex design contexts such as internationalization and cross-cultural, this framework also demonstrates superior adaptability and strategy generation potential, which is conducive to promoting the evolution of design assistance tools towards an intelligent collaboration paradigm with higher-level cognitive support capabilities.

Keywords: Critical Thinking, Human-computer Interaction, Design, Dual Agents

DOI: 10.54941/ahfe1007512

Cite this paper
Downloads
1
Visits
3
Download PDF

More from this volume

Inclusive Navigation Design: Exploring How Tactile Cues Shape Trust and Exploration Intention for Visual Impaired UserConnecting with the Future Ecological Self through LLM Agents
View all articles in Human-Computer Interaction & Emerging Technologies